home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
102191
/
1021100.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
5KB
|
104 lines
<text id=91TT2321>
<title>
Oct. 21, 1991: Thomas Hearings:An Ugly Circus
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
Oct. 21, 1991 Sex, Lies & Politics
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
NATION, Page 34
COVER STORIES
An Ugly Circus
</hdr><body>
<p>Into the arena there came two gladiators, fourteen Senators
and an audience of millions. But could anyone possibly declare
victory when the spectacle was so repellent?
</p>
<p>By Nancy Gibbs
</p>
<p> The United States Senate is not a circus that children
should attend. It is far too dangerous. Last week, as the
lawmakers presided over the public evisceration of Clarence
Thomas and Anita Hill, it became clear that this was a circus
with an ancient history stretching back to the days when people
were fed to lions. This was the kind with real victims, and no
nets.
</p>
<p> Hour after hour, an intensely personal drama was played
out under achingly bright lights and devoured by tens of
millions around the world. In a sense, America caught its first
glimpse of the real Clarence Thomas, heard his voice for the
first time after 100 days of confirmation torture. Gone were the
handlers and the fancy advisers who had told him that when
questioned about the most important legal issues of the day, he
should hide his beliefs at all costs. Last week he sat there
alone, reduced to surviving on discipline and guts and the
memory of past victories hard won. It was difficult to listen
to him slash at the Senators for their betrayal and not view him
as the victim of terrible harm.
</p>
<p> And then there was Professor Anita Hill, the poised
daughter of so many generations of black women who have been
burned carrying torches into the battle for principle. The cause
of civil rights and social justice has so often fallen to them
to defend. Harriet Tubman and Sojourner Truth were slaves by
birth, freedom fighters by temperament. Rosa Parks was a tired
seamstress who shoved history forward by refusing to give up her
seat on the bus. Mechelle Vinson was a bank teller who, having
grown weary of a boss who she said forced her to trade sex for
professional survival, won the unanimous Supreme Court decision
that established the laws on sexual harassment once and for all.
The latest to claim her place in line is Anita Hill, a private,
professional woman unwilling to relinquish her dignity without
a fight.
</p>
<p> Even after listening to all the anguished testimony, who
could ever feel confident that they knew what really happened?
Which one was a liar of epic proportion? This was not a forum
that lent itself to justice or even a fearless search for
truth. The U.S. Senate is a stage normally reserved for
politicians debating war and peace and issues draped in high
ideals. It is not a forum accustomed to interrogations about
large-breasted women having sex with animals.
</p>
<p> The questions came from a group of Senators who had been
disfigured by a failure of both intellect and empathy. Faced
with a wounded woman, 14 men merely turned their heads. The most
generous explanation is that it was more a political lapse than
a human one. But even when the legal arguments and public outcry
followed, it took considerable patient explaining to show the
distinguished members that they had made a travesty of the
confirmation process and a mess of two people's lives.
</p>
<p> When the circus tent opened, there sat a row of white men,
some of great stature, who made every effort to disappear
behind the thin silhouette of their microphones. Here were
career public servants, never camera shy, being forced to ask
questions like "Professor Hill, now that you have read the FBI
report, you can see that it contains no reference to any mention
of Judge Thomas' private parts or sexual prowess. Why didn't you
tell the FBI about that?" Having begun the week under fire for
their sexism, the Senators ended the week accused of acting like
a high-tech lynch mob. "I would have preferred an assassin's
bullet," Thomas declared, to the ordeal they had reserved for
him.
</p>
<p> And finally there was the vast national audience,
transfixed by testimony that seeped into every conversation. The
tragedy might at least have a valuable legacy if it left
America's workers with a higher code of conduct to take into
their jobs every day. But the actual spectacle left the watcher
feeling demeaned and humiliated and terribly sad. So much
substance was at stake, and so many symbols, that it almost
seemed preferable to call it all off and go home before any more
damage was done. In the end, of course, there would be no
winners, only scars.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>